Nine months in the past, John Steenhuisen, who leads South Africa’s second-largest political party, the Democratic Alliance, stood earlier than information cameras and signed an settlement to not work with the long-governing party, the African National Congress.
“So assist me God,” Mr. Steenhuisen mentioned, elevating his proper hand and chuckling.
But when the African National Congress didn’t safe a governing majority in final week’s election and on Thursday invited its political opponents to affix forces in a authorities of nationwide unity, Mr. Steenhuisen moved to the entrance of the pack of political leaders trying to work with the party he had sworn off.
He and the Democratic Alliance are actually plowing forward with an important political negotiations in South Africa because the finish of apartheid in 1994 and have drafted a doc laying out their core rules for becoming a member of a authorities with the African National Congress, or A.N.C.
The governing party’s slide — taking simply 40 % of the vote, ending three a long time of dominance — has left Mr. Steenhuisen, 48, standing on the brink of his political goals. As head of the party that took second place, with almost 22 % of the vote, Mr. Steenhuisen appears prone to get a number one function within the subsequent authorities, political analysts say.
But whilst he’s rising, Mr. Steenhuisen should navigate the difficult third-rail of South African society: race.
Mr. Steenhuisen is white, and the nationwide management of his party is predominantly white. In a rustic that’s 80 % Black, many nonetheless view him and his center-right party, which is favored by many in huge enterprise and the non-public sector, as champions of white pursuits. Political analysts attribute this partly to the unresolved trauma of apartheid but additionally to the Democratic Alliance’s typically flip and clumsy dealing with of racial points.
“There’s perceptions,” Mr. Steenhuisen mentioned in an interview final 12 months. “One of them is, ‘Oh, the D.A.’s going to convey again apartheid.’ I believe there’s a belief deficit nonetheless that exists across the race situation.”
Mr. Steenhuisen has reduce a pointy path to energy, with appeal and a fast wit but additionally a bullishness that some say teeters on vanity. He began as an formidable 22-year-old council member within the nation’s third-largest metropolis and rose to the highest submit within the Democratic Alliance, which grew out of an anti-apartheid party led by white South Africans.
The Democratic Alliance as it’s identified at present was fashioned in 2000 with the merger of a number of events. By that time it was already the second-largest party within the nation, partly as a result of it attracted white voters after the disbanding of the National Party, which led the apartheid authorities.
Over the years, the Democratic Alliance was in a position to courtroom the nation’s racial minorities — people who find themselves white, Indian or coloured, a multiracial classification. The party additionally grew its base with Black voters, notably those that believed that the A.N.C.’s efforts to undo racial disparities didn’t empower Black South Africans.
Today, the Democratic Alliance’s largest promoting level is much less corruption and higher monetary administration within the cities and the lone province, the Western Cape, the place it governs.
Some inside the A.N.C. vehemently oppose bringing the Democratic Alliance right into a governing coalition, saying that the party has opposed efforts to undo the racial disparities that also linger from apartheid, particularly in wealth, land possession and employment. Opponents additionally accuse the Democratic Alliance of peddling racism.
Some A.N.C. members even began a petition to cease a coalition with the Mr. Steenhuisen’s party, taking situation with its opposition to legal guidelines supporting affirmative motion, common well being care and land redistribution. They additionally posted a picture of a seven-year-old tweet by one of many Democratic Alliance’s prime leaders, Helen Zille, that tried to place a optimistic spin on colonialism.
“For these claiming legacy of colonialism was ONLY destructive, consider our unbiased judiciary, transport infrastructure, piped water and so forth.,” Ms. Zille wrote.
Mr. Steenhuisen took management of the Democratic Alliance 5 years in the past, changing its first Black chief, Mmusi Maimane, whom he had labored alongside because the opposition’s chief whip in Parliament. Mr. Maimane’s resignation after the Democratic Alliance’s disappointing electoral exhibiting in 2019, in addition to the departures of a number of different outstanding Black members earlier than and after him, has fueled the narrative of a party hostile towards Black folks.
In a tell-all memoir printed this 12 months, Mr. Maimane accused Mr. Steenhuisen of thwarting his efforts to alter the party into one that might appeal to extra Black voters.
A spokeswoman for Mr. Steenhuisen declined to remark and mentioned that he was unavailable for an interview.
Mr. Steenhuisen mentioned within the interview final 12 months that he believed that “race performs a task” in South African society. But he differed with the A.N.C. on the best way to deal with racial disparities.
He mentioned that taking a colorblind strategy to tackling poverty would in the end uplift Black South Africans. The governing party’s strategy to racial redress has largely helped politically related Black elites, he mentioned.
Mr. Steenhuisen’s party has proposed dropping affirmative motion insurance policies, selling extra non-public sector involvement in state companies like electrical energy, growing some welfare grants and reducing taxes on sure meals objects.
But notably, the rules the Democratic Alliance laid out for its negotiations with the A.N.C. didn’t embody ending racial desire packages.
Critics say the Democratic Alliance does play on race to win assist, if typically as canine whistles.
For a protest final 12 months in opposition to an A.N.C.-backed legislation requiring some employers to satisfy racial quotas in hiring, the Democratic Alliance bused in residents from coloured townships to march by means of downtown Cape Town.
“The Black individuals are getting jobs, and our coloreds don’t get any,” mentioned Reneé Ferris, who attended the demonstration and mentioned she was on the lookout for work as a cleaner.
Mr. Steenhuisen, who grew up within the coastal metropolis of Durban, has mentioned that monetary challenges prevented him from ending school.
He joined his hometown council in 1999 and was fast to volunteer for website visits to examine metropolis infrastructure, or handy out leaflets at weekend rugby matches, mentioned Gillian Noyce, who served alongside him.
By age 30, Mr. Steenhuisen turned the pinnacle of the Democratic Alliance’s caucus within the City Council, main extra seasoned lawmakers. Three years later, he led the party within the province, KwaZulu-Natal, and in simply two extra years, he was elected to the nationwide Parliament.
He cultivated relationships with colleagues and constituents alike, and a number of other of his critics and champions mentioned he has a definite means to learn a room. He hosted Christmas events at his house and arranged after-work drinks every week, Ms. Noyce recalled.
But in 2010, it turned public that Mr. Steenhuisen had been dishonest on his spouse of 10 years with a party spokeswoman, who was married to a different member of the party. Mr. Steenhuisen resigned as party chief in KwaZulu Natal Province. He is now married to the lady with whom he had the affair. In a rustic accustomed to political scandal, the episode didn’t thwart Mr. Steenhuisen’s rise.
He has fought bruising battles inside the party, garnering a fame as somebody who brooks no dissent, former members mentioned.
Three days after final week’s election, Mr. Steenhuisen was in a Zoom assembly with the leaders of a number of smaller events who additionally signed the pledge final 12 months to not work with the A.N.C. Some of them scolded the Democratic Alliance over experiences that it might not uphold its dedication to the pact, in keeping with a recording of the assembly obtained by The New York Times.
It appeared, to Mr. Steenhuisen’s critics, that on the whiff of energy, he and his party had been able to abandon rules that he had advocated.
“Nobody will belief them sooner or later once more,” the chief of a small party mentioned of the Democratic Alliance.
“With respect, you converse with no authority in regards to the D.A. and what it will do or not going to do,” Mr. Steenhuisen shot again. “You want to grasp that very, very clearly.”