When “The Jinx” premiered in 2015, it was one of many pillars of the brand new true-crime wave — high-end however sufficiently lurid, with soap-opera twists but additionally documentary legitimacy. In the absence of prison justice, perhaps leisure justice might suffice.
Now the director Andrew Jarecki is again with “The Jinx — Part Two,” six extra episodes detailing the stranger-than-fiction saga of the true property scion and convicted assassin Robert Durst. (Only the primary 4 episodes had been made out there for assessment. Hmm!) This “Jinx” isn’t nearly Durst, although; it’s a “Jinx” about “The Jinx,” folding the story again in on itself but once more, further layers of narratives and truths and maybe-truths, all getting rolled out collectively as scrumptious, buttery true-crime dough.
The first episode, which airs Sunday at 10 p.m. on HBO, contains footage of dozens of individuals linked to the case all gathering to observe the unique finale collectively. That was certainly a stunning episode of tv, with Durst’s hot-mic lavatory confession as its astounding but becoming conclusion. (The filmmakers later confronted criticism for considerably modifying Durst’s remarks, however maintained that the edits had been consultant of what he stated.) The response scene performs out not with churning pathos however as an alternative like TikToks of individuals watching Ned Stark meet his stunning destiny or movies of followers in a sports activities bar groaning in unison. Even topics of “The Jinx” expertise it as a present, as fandom of 1’s personal life.
Over and over, this “Jinx” contains folks discussing unique “Jinx.” Some describe it on to Jarecki in interviews, or they point out it in recorded telephone calls Durst produced from jail, or they are saying on the witness stand that they watched the present, that they discovered particulars of the case from TV. Actual courthouse footage blends along with hazy re-creation photos, and we hear actual audio however over faux visuals. And because the present turns its consideration to Durst’s long-delayed trial, “The Jinx” takes on a behind-the-scenes high quality as a lot as a true-crime one.
This “Jinx” maintains the unique’s inescapable momentum, which feels nearly miraculous provided that Durst died in 2022. It’s additionally a warped, fascinating paean to the facility of friendship, with Durst demonstrating that constant, chatty telephone calls and some piles of cash could make a stunning variety of folks look the opposite approach relating to homicide. “What do you do when your finest good friend kills your different finest good friend?” wonders one such affiliate, who for many years apparently concluded the reply was “nothing.”
Putting “The Jinx” in dialog with itself is a helpful approach of getting the present reckon with its successors, which embrace fellow status tabloid reveals and in addition shakier, typically exploitative true-crime collection.
The attract of the primary installment was, partially, Durst’s audaciousness, the hubris of all of it. Periodically on this new set of episodes, folks acknowledge that taking part in a documentary about how you bought away with homicide is a fairly efficient solution to cease getting away with homicide. But oh, the celebrity! One upside of the true-crime glut is the frequent publicity of policing and prosecution failures, a suggestion that our justice system can even perform as a justice financial system — and considered one of its currencies is consideration.