EGN NEWS DESK
The transfer incensed Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron on the time, dealing him a uncommon defeat and deeply complicating the U.S. Obama administration’s plan to reply to the assaults.
Obama officers overtly cited the U.Ok. vote in justifying the then-president’s failure to implement a “pink line” on Syrian chemical weapons use.
Miliband, now power secretary in Keir Starmer’s Labour authorities, was once more pressed on the choice by Times Radio Friday.
Asked if he regretted the transfer to oppose army motion, Miliband stated: “No. First of all, I very a lot welcome the autumn of President Assad, who’s a brutal dictator.”
He added: “The choice I used to be confronted with, although, in 2013 was whether or not we did a bombing of President Assad with none clear plan for British army engagement, the place it will lead and what it will imply.
“And I imagine then, and I do now, that some of the vital classes of the Iraq conflict is we shouldn’t go into army intervention and not using a clear plan, together with an exit technique.”
