EGN NEWS DESK
EXCLUSIVE: Lawyers for President-elect Donald Trump are demanding that New York Attorney General Letitia James drop her civil fraud case towards him, his household and his companies “for the larger good of the nation,” Fox News Digital has realized.
“In furtherance of our conversations together with your workplace, we write to request that you simply utterly dismiss the above-referenced case towards President Donald J. Trump, his household, and his companies, and stipulate to vacate the Judgment and dismiss all claims with prejudice,” Trump legal professional D. John Sauer wrote in a letter completely obtained by Fox News Digital.
NEW YORK APPEALS COURT APPEARS RECEPTIVE TO REVERSING OR REDUCING $454M TRUMP CIVIL FRAUD JUDGMENT
Trump was ordered to pay a $454 million civil fraud judgment in James’ lawsuit towards him.
Trump has appealed the ruling, and judges on a New York appeals court docket appeared open-minded and receptive to probably reversing the judgment altogether.
Sauer, although, pointed to Trump’s “historic election victory.”
“President Trump has known as for our Nation’s partisan strife to finish, and for the contending factions to hitch forces for the larger good of the nation,” Sauer wrote. “This name for unity extends to the authorized onslaught towards him and his household that permeated the newest election cycle.”
Sauer, who was nominated as solicitor normal within the second Trump administration, known as the instances towards Trump to have been “a flashpoint of nationwide partisan division.”
“As counsel for President Trump on this enchantment—and now as his nominee for Solicitor General of the United States—I’ve had the chance to expertise this partisan division personally, and I strongly imagine that it’s essential for the well being of our Republic for the strife and lawfare to finish.”
He added: “You now have the singular alternative to assist remedy this division.”
Sauer’s letter comes after a string of authorized victories for Trump and his authorized workforce, coordinated by senior authorized adviser Boris Epshteyn.
Sauer pointed to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s current request, which was granted by federal Judge Tanya Chutkan, to dismiss his case towards Trump associated to the 2020 election. Smith additionally tossed his enchantment within the labeled data case on Monday, after a federal judge dismissed the costs altogether in July, ruling that he was unlawfully appointed as particular counsel.”
New York Attorney General Letitia James speaks throughout the press briefing with Gov. Kathy Hochul discussing the influence of 2024 presidential election. (Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket by way of Getty Images)
In New York v. Trump, Judge Juan Merchan granted Trump’s request to file a movement to dismiss the costs stemming from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case and eliminated the sentencing date for the president-elect from the schedule.
“This case warrants the identical therapy,” Sauer wrote.
Sauer reminded that in James’ case, “the statute of limitations bars claims and legal responsibility.”
TRUMP’S $454M JUDGMENT BOND SLASHED BY MORE THAN HALF IN APPEALS COURT RULING
Sauer additionally reminded that her case includes “no victims, no complaints, no misstatements, no causation, and no accidents or losses.”
“Instead, President Trump supplied clear and unambiguous disclaimers to classy industrial events who made selections primarily based on their very own due diligence,” Sauer wrote. “Every mortgage and insurance coverage cost was made in full, and both on time or early.”
Sauer mentioned Trump’s enterprise companions “have been delighted with these transactions” and “benefited enormously, making over $100 million in income.”
Sauer mentioned that the proof “definitively demonstrates that the defendants’ counterparties weren’t deceived, that they carried out their very own due diligence and eagerly sought, and embraced, the extremely worthwhile enterprise transactions, and that the challenged statements didn’t have an effect on the phrases of any transaction.”
“As famous above, they have been paid again in full, on time or early,” he mentioned.
Sauer mentioned that “the chilling impact generated by this case is crushing to companies throughout New York, who’re being compelled to flee to friendlier States the place such standardless enforcement and extreme punishment will not be discovered.”
“President Trump is likely one of the most profitable builders within the historical past of New York,” Sauer mentioned. “He rebuilt the New York skyline, created 1000’s of jobs, rescued and rejuvenated historic Wollman Rink, developed the $3 billion West Side Railyards from 59th to 72nd Street in Manhattan, was deeply concerned in growing the Jacob Javits Center, and is singularly liable for many different successes,” Sauer wrote. “This lawsuit towards him ‘vindicates no public objective.’”
Trump legal professional D. John Sauer. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Sauer pointed Trump’s large landslide victory and his pending inauguration because the forty seventh president.
Sauer additionally pointed to remarks by previous presidents, particularly on Oct. 3, 1863, throughout “the time of our Nation’s biggest division,” when President Abraham Lincoln issued the Thanksgiving Proclamation.
“President Lincoln known as for the American folks to put aside their bitter divisions in order that the blessings of liberty may very well be ‘solemnly, reverently, and gratefully acknowledged as with one coronary heart and one voice by the entire American folks.’” Sauer wrote. “He urged all Americans to ‘fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty hand to heal the injuries of the nation, and to revive it, as quickly as could also be in line with the Divine functions, to the complete enjoyment of peace, concord, tranquility, and union.’”
Sauer added: “Invoking the identical spirit of unity, we request that you simply stipulate to the vacatur of the Judgment and dismissal of this case with prejudice.”
TRUMP VOWS TO FIGHT NEW YORK AG CASE ‘ALL THE WAY UP TO THE US SUPREME COURT,’ AS DEADLINE TO POST $454M LOOMS
Sauer’s letter comes after New York Judge Arthur Engoron dominated earlier this 12 months that Trump and different defendants have been accountable for persistent and repeated fraud, falsifying enterprise data, issuing false monetary statements, conspiracy to falsify false monetary statements, insurance coverage fraud and conspiracy to commit insurance coverage fraud.
In September 2023, earlier than the non-jury trial started, Engoron dominated that Trump and the Trump Organization had dedicated fraud whereas constructing his actual property empire by deceiving banks, insurers and others by overvaluing his belongings and exaggerating his internet price on paperwork utilized in making offers and securing financing.
Trump was hit with an preliminary penalty of $355 million. That sum is shortly growing by way of curiosity accruals of roughly $112,000 a day till paid in full, now sitting round $470 million.
Trump’s authorized workforce mentioned the preliminary requested bond was “unprecedented for a non-public firm,” and mentioned to publish it within the judgment’s full quantity was a “sensible impossibility.”
An appeals court docket slashed Trump’s bond cost in March, and the previous president paid $175 million.
President-elect Trump arrives to talk throughout an Election Night occasion on the Palm Beach Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Fla., Nov. 6. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Trump has vowed to combat the case “all the way in which as much as the U.S. Supreme Court if essential.”
Trump and his household denied any wrongdoing, with the previous president saying his belongings had been undervalued. Trump’s authorized workforce insisted that his monetary statements had disclaimers, and made it clear to banks that they need to conduct their very own assessments.
Throughout the trial, Trump attorneys introduced witnesses, together with former Deutsche Bank prime executives, who testified the banks sought extra enterprise from Trump, whom they seen as a “whale of a shopper.”
Trump’s protection additionally introduced in knowledgeable witnesses, together with New York University accounting professor Eli Bartov, who reviewed the Trump monetary statements at situation within the case and mentioned he discovered no proof of accounting fraud.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Bartov testified final month that Trump’s monetary statements didn’t violate accounting rules, and he advised that something problematic — like an enormous year-to-year leap within the estimated worth of his Trump Tower penthouse — was merely an error.
“My fundamental discovering is that there isn’t any proof in any way of any accounting fraud,” Bartov testified. Trump’s monetary statements, he mentioned, “weren’t materially misstated.”
