Record Number of Writers Were Jailed Globally in 2023, PEN America Says

The variety of jailed writers in China surpassed 100 for the primary time because the nation continued to be the largest jailer of writers, in keeping with PEN America, a free expression group, which launched its annual Freedom to Write Index on Wednesday.

PEN America reported that 339 writers have been imprisoned in 2023, probably the most within the 5 years it has been producing the index.

The variety of jailed writers — an inventory that excludes reporters, however consists of literary writers, poets, on-line commentators and opinion writers — has usually gone up over the previous 5 years, mentioned Karin Karlekar, the director of writers in danger at PEN America. “We are seeing worsening threats in opposition to writers,” she mentioned.

There are 107 writers incarcerated in China, the group mentioned, 50 of whom are “‘on-line commentators’ writing about political and financial points and expressing pro-democracy viewpoints.” Others confronted trial final 12 months below the 2020 nationwide safety regulation that squashed dissent in Hong Kong.

Some of the important thing numbers from 2023 embody:

• Writers susceptible to being jailed: 923

• Male writers jailed: 288

• Female writers jailed: 51

• Online commentators jailed: 180

PEN America additionally gave particular point out to Iran as a spot the place the “crackdown on writers and the inventive group continued” final 12 months. Iran arrested 13 writers in 2023, the second-highest within the index after China, bringing its whole to 49 imprisoned.

“Women who wrote or advocated in opposition to the obligatory hijab remained notably in danger, and Iran jails the very best variety of feminine writers worldwide,” PEN America mentioned.

Saudi Arabia and Vietnam have been tied for third place within the index, with 19 writers jailed in every nation.

Notable will increase from 2022 included the variety of feminine journalists jailed (to 51 from 35) and the variety of jailed on-line commentators (to 180, from 80). PEN America outlined a web based commentator as anybody who writes on social media or different on-line platforms.

“In many nations that is the one house for dissenting views to be heard,” Ms. Karlekar mentioned. Online expression tends to fret authoritarian governments, she added, due to the web’s speedy influence and world attain.

Russia and Israel entered the listing of the Top 10 greatest jailers, as Ms. Karlekar famous that nations with battle or struggle crack down on dissent.

“As geopolitics proceed to shift and authoritarian tendencies unfold to nations that have been as soon as thought of safely anchored in openness, we anticipate that free expression, and subsequently writers, will more and more be below menace in a a lot wider vary of nations,” PEN America mentioned in a press release.

The Israel-Hamas struggle has additionally roiled PEN America itself. The group canceled its 2024 literary awards ceremony, which had been deliberate for Monday, after months of protests and as practically half the prize nominees withdrew over the group’s response to the struggle, which was criticized as overly sympathetic to Israel.

Journalists world wide are additionally going through extra hazard. The Committee to Protect Journalists mentioned that 320 journalists have been incarcerated as of Dec. 1, 2023, the second-highest year-end whole for the reason that group started monitoring them in 1992.

Among these imprisoned is the Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, who was arrested throughout a reporting journey to Yekaterinburg, Russia, in March 2023.

The Committee to Protect Journalists mentioned the excessive variety of jailed journalists was a “disturbing barometer of entrenched authoritarianism and the vitriol of governments decided to smother impartial voices.”

PEN America’s index largely focuses on particular person writers’ circumstances. “When a single dissenting voice is jailed, it has a wider influence on society as an entire,” Ms. Karlekar mentioned, including that it could actually result in much less dialogue, much less discourse and self censorship.