EGN NEWS DESK
“It’s too late to cease Antarctic ice soften.” But “the Greenland ice sheet is likely to be extra proof against warming than we thought”, based on numerous latest research. So ought to we cease worrying? Or quit on local weather motion? As we pace in the direction of this yr’s UN Climate Conference COP28, to be held in – of all locations – oil-rich Dubai, whereas wars within the Middle East and in Ukraine are distracting consideration from the planet-threatening local weather disaster, what we want is just not complacency or resignation however a heightened sense of urgency.
The planet’s ice and different points of local weather change are getting a whole lot of media consideration proper now. And rightly so. This was to be a key yr for local weather motion
This decade is crunch-time. And the storms, floods, fires and document air and ocean temperatures we have now been seeing across the globe are exhibiting us local weather change in motion. We are working out of time. The query is how headlines suggesting both it may very well be too late – or that we nonetheless have loads of time – will have an effect on public behaviour and this yr’s local weather negotiations, developing very quickly.
Too late to cease Antarctic ice soften?
The Antarctic is that includes prominently within the media. We are catching up on a whole lot of misplaced time. Easier accessibility and advances in satellite tv for pc and different monitoring know-how in addition to the picturesque, media-friendly panorama with ice, snow and penguins have attracted consideration to tales concerning the “bastion of chilly” within the far south of the planet. Alas, the information isn’t good. A research printed final week has the potential to depress us all and be misused as an excuse to desert local weather motion and the power revolution.
Kaitlin Naughton from British Antarctic Survey (BAS) , lead writer of “Unavoidable future improve in West Antarctic ice-shelf melting over the twenty-first century”, printed in Nature Climate Change on October 23, sums up the findings in The Conversation: “The charge at which the warming Southern Ocean melts the West Antarctic ice sheet will pace up quickly over the course of this century, no matter how a lot emissions fall in coming many years, our new analysis suggests. This ocean-driven melting is anticipated to extend sea-level rise, with penalties for coastal communities around the globe. “
The Antarctic ice sheet is the world’s largest quantity of land-based ice. Coastal ice cabinets are the floating edges of this ice sheet which stabilise the glaciers behind them. The ocean melts these ice cabinets from under, and if melting will increase and an ice shelf thins, the pace at which these glaciers discharge contemporary water into the ocean will increase and sea ranges rise, Naughton explains.
In West Antarctica, the world most susceptible to local weather warming, this course of has been underway for many years. Ice cabinets are thinning, glaciers are flowing quicker in the direction of the ocean and the ice sheet is shrinking. Naughton and her colleagues selected to mannequin the “most susceptible sector of the ice sheet”, the Amundsen Sea. Using the UK’s nationwide supercomputer ARCHER2 , the workforce ran many alternative simulations of the twenty first century, “totalling over 4,000 years of ocean warming and ice-shelf melting within the Amundsen Sea.”
They thought-about totally different situations for future burning of fossil fuels, from the best-case state of affairs the place international warming is restricted to 1.5°C according to the Paris Agreement, to the worst, by which “coal, oil and fuel use is uncontrolled.” They additionally took account of the affect of pure variations within the local weather, reminiscent of El Niño.
“The outcomes are worrying”, Naughton concludes. “In all simulations there’s a speedy improve over the course of this century within the charge of ocean warming and ice-shelf melting. Even the best-case state of affairs by which warming halts at 1.5°C, one thing that’s thought-about bold by many specialists, entails a threefold improve within the historic charge of warming and melting.”
Constructive reporting in disaster?
As the lead writer discusses in The Conversation, this makes it exhausting to convey throughout a optimistic message:
“How do you inform a foul information story? The typical knowledge is that you just’re supposed to offer folks hope: to say that there’s a catastrophe behind one door, however we are able to keep away from it if solely we select a unique one. What do you do when your science tells you that every one doorways result in the identical catastrophe?”
An extraordinarily sobering query, particularly coming from a scientist on the slicing fringe of analysis. Naughton suggests we have now to shift our consideration to the long term:
“The future is not going to finish in 2100, even when most individuals studying this can not be round. Our simulations of the 1.5°C state of affairs present ice-shelf melting beginning to plateau by the tip of the century, suggesting that additional modifications within the twenty second century and past should be preventable. Reducing sea-level rise after 2100, and even slowing it down, may save many coastal cities.”
But most of us people are inclined to reside within the here-and-now and are unwilling to look past, and make sacrifices within the pursuits of future generations. The problem is to keep away from resignation and ensure worrying findings like these don’t develop into an excuse for inaction and enterprise as standard.
Should we cease worrying about Greenland’s ice sheet?
Another latest research printed within the scientific journal Nature on October 18 highlights the hazard of the alternative excessive:
“The Greenland ice sheet is prone to be extra proof against international warming than beforehand thought”, the research finds. An worldwide workforce of scientists led by Nils Bochow from UiT The Arctic University of Norway and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research discovered that “even when essential temperature thresholds are briefly crossed by as much as 6.5 levels Celsius till 2100, a doable tipping of the ice sheet and due to this fact drastic sea degree rise over lots of of hundreds of years may very well be prevented. To obtain this, measures to scale back greenhouse gases must be taken as rapidly as doable following the essential rise in temperature, in order that the temperature may be stabilized at not more than 1.5 levels Celsius above pre-industrial ranges in the long run.”
6.5°C? Did I learn proper? So – the Greenland ice won’t soften in spite of everything – aha! We nonetheless have time to overshoot by an incredible quantity? Great materials for many who wish to extend the exploitation and burning of fossil fuels and postpone the power transition for so long as doable. The threat of the findings being misused by those that wish to play down the chance of exceeding the 1.5°C restrict is worrying.
In truth the authors are eager to emphasize that this could not be the conclusion and that we nonetheless have to hold temperature rise down:
”We discovered that the ice sheet reacts so slowly to human-made warming that reversing the present warming pattern by slicing greenhouse fuel emissions inside centuries could forestall it from tipping. Yet, additionally simply briefly overshooting the temperature thresholds can nonetheless result in a peak in sea degree rise of greater than a metre in our simulations”, stated co-author Niklas Boers from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and the Technical University of Munich, Germany.
The authors warning that their outcomes are primarily based on restricted ice sheet modelling that “disregards how the concerted international local weather change influences the Arctic local weather aside from temperatures and precipitation”. In different phrases, we solely have one a part of the story right here. They stress that basically all different sub-elements of the local weather system react quicker to international warming than an ice sheet. These embody rainforests, wind and precipitation patterns, or ocean present techniques, which all change and even decide to abrupt, irreversible modifications on considerably shorter time scales, resulting in a lot shorter home windows of alternative to keep away from tipping.
“And even when avoiding a large-scale tipping of the Greenland ice sheet, non permanent sea-level rise may be substantial. The larger temperatures rise, the tougher will probably be to convey them right down to protected ranges in the long run. This is why we have to act quick and hold international imply temperatures under 1.5 levels Celsius”, concludes Niklas Boers.
“The Greenland ice sheet is only a small a part of the image and there are numerous different detrimental penalties associated to human made local weather change that we would face if we don’t act in time.”
There we have now it. But provided that we glance into the entire story.
Bringing the newest science collectively
I used to be just lately within the Norwegian capital Oslo for some conferences with scientists and colleagues from the International Cryosphere Climate Initiative (ICCI). I’ve been doing a little work with the organisation, which publishes the annual “State of the Cryosphere” Report, with this yr’s research as a consequence of be launched shortly, forward of COP28. What these scientists needed to say, primarily based on the very newest analysis findings, left me in completely little question that 1.5°C is absolutely the higher restrict to avert additional injury to the ice- and snow-covered areas of our planet, and ensuing devastating impacts worldwide.
Ice sheets and glaciers: Thresholds and Feedback
At a public lecture occasion at Oslo University organised by ICCI and WWF, three main specialists introduced an outline of the newest science on all issues icy. Chris Stokes from the University of Durham is without doubt one of the world’s main scientists on glaciers and ice sheets:
“I believe one of many worrying issues – and one of many worrying messages to policymakers – is that each time we get new measurements, new knowledge, new observations, it appears to be exhibiting that issues are worse than earlier than, possibly only a few years in the past. And this, I believe, is identical for each Greenland and Antarctica,” he informed the viewers.
Looking at previous local weather offers important insights that assist us perceive what’s occurring now and what’s prone to happen sooner or later, says Stokes:
“There’s a extremely vital lesson from the previous that sea degree rise from ice sheets may be a lot, a lot faster than we’re experiencing at current. I believe that truth generally will get misplaced once we’re speaking about millimetres per yr.”
The message from the previous is just not encouraging:
“We know previously, for instance, that when sea degree rose, significantly round about 14,500 years in the past, there have been jumps. And a few of these jumps have been so speedy that we may have seen charges of sea degree rise approaching 4 metres per century”.
Now that could be a scary thought.
“It is absolutely worrying”, Stokes says, and it’s because there are a variety of self-sustaining reinforcing suggestions mechanisms that happen inside ice sheets. They don’t reply linearly to local weather forcing”, he explains. “There’ll be a degree the place there’s a sluggish response after which unexpectedly you cross a threshold and it turns into way more speedy.”
The ice professional is frightened by the truth that throughout his lifetime we have now already added virtually 100 ppm of CO2 to the environment – as a lot as the quantity related to deglaciation previously, the shift from a glacial to an inter-glacial interval, which took round 10,000 years.
Unlikely hotspots
West Antarctica, as mentioned above, is the world of Antarctica most topic to melting. Eastern Antarctica was lengthy thought-about insensitive to local weather warming. Perceptions right here, too, are altering, says Stokes:
” I appeared again within the literature: simply possibly 30 years in the past, folks used to argue and level out from a few of the very primary numerical modelling that it could take 16 levels of warming earlier than we noticed a response from East Antarctica. And we now assume that’s lower than 2 levels for some elements of East Antarctica. So once more, the science is transferring ahead very quickly right here.”
The researchers have recognized “hotspots”, particularly within the Wilkes Land area.
“We have a mini West Antarctica situated right here on this a part of East Antarctica. Mass loss right here is now ten occasions larger than it was a decade in the past. We know that the circumpolar deep water has warmed by round a level to 2 levels for the reason that Nineties, and a few of the work we just lately did confirmed the grounding-line retreat for one of many glaciers right here is definitely akin to the Thwaites glacier – the “Doomsday” glacier, which is properly publicised.
“We’re beginning to see some actually worrying indicators fom East Antarctica”, he informed his engrossed Oslo viewers, that we actually have to keep watch over.”
Acid oceans
Sea degree rise is just not the one issue we have now to fret about. Helen Findlay from Plymouth Marine Laboratory is a organic oceanographer and professional on local weather impacts, particularly ocean acidification by way of the elevated focus of CO2 on this planet’s oceans.
“Polar oceans are way more delicate to rising temperatures and CO2 than the worldwide common, some modifications are irreversible or very long-term by way of warming and acidification, and important injury might be felt at 2°C. 1.5°C will drastically restrict that lack of ecosystems. But we’re truly already seeing a whole lot of these impacts at one diploma and we have to act now,” she stated in Oslo.
“When we focus in on the Arctic Ocean, practically each projection into the long run, from low emissions as much as excessive emissions, will see us transfer into corrosive waters, corrosive situations. Even within the low emissions situations, nearly all of the water column are going to be experiencing these corrosive situations and exposing organisms to these situations. The drawback with acidification, is that it’s basically everlasting. We’re speaking about geological timescales for issues to get well, tens of hundreds of years. So if we have been to cease emitting CO2 within the 2100s and simply stayed at these ranges, then the pH of the oceans, each the Arctic and the Southern Ocean, wouldn’t flip again to the place they have been earlier than”.
When we have a look at these local weather impacts, we have a tendency to speak about international averages. The scientists talking in Oslo reminded us that there might be enormous regional variations. Whether we have a look at sea degree rise, geo-hazards or ocean acidification, some areas might be hit a lot more durable than others. Findlay has a formidable instance from the newest planetary boundaries report. While it discovered that the boundary for ocean acidification “is near being breached”, areas of the polar oceans have lengthy crossed the road.
Geo-hazards and meals insecurity
It’s not simply the polar ice that’s inflicting concern. Ugo Nanni from the University of Oslo is an professional on mountain glaciers. The previous two summers noticed a drastic decline in Europe’s alpine glaciers. Even within the icy Himalayas, melting ice and snow by way of our human-induced international warming are posing an enormous menace. A research printed earlier this yr confirmed that unprecedented and largely irreversible modifications to the Hindu Kush Himalayan cryosphere, pushed by international temperature rises, threaten two billion folks and are accelerating species extinction.
Nanni outlined the geo-hazards referring to ice and snow soften – landslides, avalanches, floods. He additionally careworn the worldwide relevance of snow and ice for meals and water. Not solely do native communities rely upon water from glaciers for ingesting and agriculture – 16 p.c of merchandise produced utilizing snow soften are traded globally, says Nanni. He too introduced highly effective proof that the impacts of warming on the cryosphere might be a lot stronger if we go over 2 levels.
Cryosphere and the UN local weather negotiations
There is an growing consciousness that the cryosphere performs an enormous and lengthy underrated function in the way forward for our planet. To date, although, this has not been adequately mirrored within the UN Climate talks. Alliances are working at numerous ranges to convey this into the COP negotiations. At final yr’s COP27 in Egypt, a bunch of 20 nations created the Ambition on Melting Ice (AMI) high-level group on Sea-level Rise and Mountain Water Resources (AMI) “to make sure that the irreversible and devastating international impacts of cryosphere loss are understood by political leaders and the general public alike: not solely inside mountain and polar areas, however all through the planet.” At the One Planet – Polar Summit in Paris in early November, France will be part of the group and lead a push to encourage extra nations to affix and improve consciousness and strain.
As far as defending the planet’s ice and snow is anxious, the science delivers a transparent message. 1.5°C is a crimson line that should not be crossed. Even the upper 2°C nonetheless technically allowed by the Paris Agreement would lead to very drastic impacts.
There are indicators of hope
On the optimistic aspect, the World Energy Outlook 2023 from the International Energy Agency (IAE) registers appreciable progress in decreasing emissions:
“The mixture of rising momentum behind clear power applied sciences and structural financial shifts around the globe has main implications for fossil fuels, with peaks in international demand for coal, oil and pure fuel all seen this decade – the primary time this has occurred in a WEO state of affairs primarily based on in the present day’s coverage settings”, the report reads.
“In this state of affairs, the share of fossil fuels in international power provide, which has been caught for many years at round 80%, declines to 73% by 2030, with international energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions peaking by 2025.
Global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from power use and trade may even peak as quickly as this yr, based on a Carbon Brief evaluation of the IEA figures, partly as a consequence of what the outlook describes because the “legacy of the worldwide power disaster triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”
These are indicators of enchancment. But the world remains to be not transferring quick sufficient:
“As issues stand, demand for fossil fuels is about to stay far too excessive to maintain inside attain the Paris Agreement purpose of limiting the rise in common international temperatures to 1.5 °C”, based on the IEA.
“This dangers not solely worsening local weather impacts after a yr of record-breaking warmth, but in addition undermining the safety of the power system, which was constructed for a cooler world with much less excessive climate occasions. Bending the emissions curve onto a path per 1.5 °C stays doable however very tough. The prices of inaction may very well be huge: regardless of the spectacular clear power development primarily based on in the present day’s coverage settings, international emissions would stay excessive sufficient to push up international common temperatures by round 2.4 °C this century, properly above the important thing threshold set out within the Paris Agreement, “ the IEA concludes.
Tough occasions for discussing local weather
That units the bar very excessive for the negotiators in Dubai. Germany’s particular envoy for local weather motion, former WRI local weather lead and Greenpeace chief Jennifer Morgan has been warning that the rise in wars and conflicts, not least within the Middle East, may properly distract consideration for the necessity for pressing local weather motion. The world can not afford that, she informed German radio.
This yr’s UN convention is to take inventory of measures taken to this point to attain the targets of the Paris Agreement. There are fears that fossil gasoline gamers will attempt to weaken the consensus that the two°C higher restrict should give solution to 1.5°C.
If that occurred, it could spell catastrophe for our icy areas – and the remainder of the world. The impacts of melting glaciers, thawing permafrost, disappearing sea ice are inconceivable to overlook – they’re international and probably devastating.
That means, no matter we hear within the media, whether or not it appears to be a “doom and gloom” story or a “nothing to fret about” message – we should not lose sight of the crucial: we have now to scale back emissions and halt temperature rise – proper now.
We should be ready to make modifications to our existence. The states and firms which can be cashing in on fossil fuels have gotten to cease. The concept that we’ve nonetheless bought time – or that it’s too late to do something anyhow – are what we don’t want. There may hardly be extra at stake.
