EGN NEWS DESK
After the disappointing final result of COP28 in Dubai, with February threatening to be the most popular in recorded historical past – the tenth record-hot month in a row – I’ve been pushing aside this ice weblog submit, looking for the optimistic, looking for indicators that issues would possibly change for the higher in 2024. For the primary time, international warming has exceeded 1.5C throughout a complete yr. With excessive climate inflicting havoc across the globe whereas battle in Ukraine and the Middle East push the local weather emergency off the radar, that’s not a simple job.
The Arctic specifically has been the main focus of a number of alarming items of analysis revealed in the previous couple of weeks.
Arctic Ocean Heatwaves
With month-to-month international ocean floor temperature at a file excessive for the tenth consecutive month, and consultants baffled over the mechanisms accountable, a research revealed by the University of Hamburg within the journal Communications Earth & Environment discovered that marine warmth waves within the Arctic as a product of upper anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions will turn out to be an everyday incidence within the close to future. Dr. Armineh Barkhordarian and his crew from the University’s Cluster of Excellence CLICCS say their information confirms that circumstances within the Arctic have shifted since 2007. “There is much less and fewer of the thicker, several-year-old ice, whereas the share of skinny, seasonal ice is persistently rising.” However, the skinny ice is much less sturdy and melts extra rapidly, permitting incoming photo voltaic radiation to heat the water’s floor.
Between 2007 and 2021, the marginal zones of the Arctic Ocean skilled 11 marine warmth waves, producing a median temperature rise of two.2 levels Celsius above seasonal norm and lasting a median of 37 days. Since 2015, there have been Arctic marine warmth waves yearly. Officially, a marine warmth wave is asserted when temperatures on the water’s floor are larger than 95 p.c of the values from the previous 30 years for at the very least 5 consecutive days.
In 2020, probably the most highly effective warmth wave up to now within the Arctic Ocean continued for 103 days, with peak temperatures that have been 4 levels Celsius over the long-term common. The likelihood of such a warmth wave occurring with out the affect of anthropogenic greenhouse gases is lower than 1 p.c, in accordance with the calculations by local weather statistics professional Barkhordarian and his colleagues. They say this narrows down the variety of believable local weather eventualities within the Arctic. Annual marine warmth waves would be the norm. The scientists discover that warmth waves are produced when sea ice melts early and quickly after the winter. When this occurs, appreciable warmth vitality can accumulate within the water by the point most photo voltaic radiation is reached in July.
“Not simply the fixed lack of sea ice but additionally hotter waters can have dramatic unfavorable results on the Arctic ecosystem,” Barkhordarian warns. Food chains might collapse, fish shares might be diminished, and general biodiversity might decline.
“Land cowl adjustments throughout Greenland dominated by a doubling of vegetation in three many years” was the title of a research revealed by a crew of scientists from the University of Leeds in February. Greenland, the world’s largest island, coated principally by the northern hemisphere’s largest ice sheet, is popping more and more inexperienced. The consultants analysed satellite tv for pc information and located that over the past three many years, Greenland has misplaced 28,707 sq. kilometres or 11,000 sq. miles of ice. Ice is more and more giving method to tundra and shrubland. “At the identical time, water launched from the melting ice is shifting sediment and silt, and that finally varieties wetlands and fenlands,” stated Jonathan Carrivick, a scientist on the University of Leeds and co-author of the research. The wetlands, in flip, are a supply of methane emissions, making a local weather suggestions impact. The whole space of ice loss represents about 1.6 p.c of Greenland’s whole ice and glacier cowl.
Since the Nineteen Seventies, the area has been warming at double the worldwide common charge. On Greenland, common annual air temperatures between 2007 and 2012 have been 3 levels C hotter, in contrast with the 1979 to 2000 common. And the researchers warn that extra excessive temperatures are doubtless sooner or later.
The crew, which has tracked the adjustments throughout Greenland from the Nineteen Eighties via to the 2010s, say hotter air temperatures are inflicting the ice to retreat, which in flip is having an affect on the temperature of the land floor, greenhouse fuel emissions and the soundness of the panorama.
Snow and ice are good reflectors of the solar’s vitality hitting the Earth’s floor and this helps to maintain the Earth cooler. As the ice retreats, it exposes bedrock which absorbs extra photo voltaic vitality, elevating the temperature of the land floor.
Similarly, as ice melts, it will increase the amount of water in lakes. Water absorbs extra photo voltaic vitality than snow and this additionally will increase the temperature of the land floor.
Permafrost – a completely frozen layer beneath the Earth’s floor – is being degraded by the warming and in some areas, the scientists warn that this might have an effect on the infrastructure, buildings and communities that exist above it.
Michael Grimes, the lead writer of the report, stresses the adjustments are vital , “notably for the indigenous populations whose conventional subsistence looking practices depend on the soundness of those delicate ecosystems”.
At the identical time, he warns that the lack of ice mass in Greenland is a considerable contributor to international sea degree rise, and so of concern to us all.
Greenland shedding extra ice than beforehand thought
A research revealed in January within the journal Nature examining nearly 40 years of knowledge revealed that Greenland’s glaciers have misplaced extra ice than beforehand thought.
Previous assessments of Greenland’s ice loss thought-about solely the losses that have been brought on by soften and glacier motion, however didn’t embrace losses on the fringe of the ice sheet ensuing from what is called glacier terminus retreat.
“What we discovered stunned us,” the authors stated in a Nature analysis briefing about their work, quoted by Eilis Quinn on Eye on the Arctic.
“Our outcomes point out that, by neglecting calving-front retreat, present consensus estimates of ice-sheet mass steadiness have underestimated latest mass loss from Greenland by as a lot as 20 per cent,” the paper’s authors say.
The scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California drew from 5 publicly out there datasets that cumulatively tracked the month-to-month positions of 236,328 glacier edges as detected, both manually or by pc algorithms, in satellite tv for pc photographs. They coated the interval from 1985 to 2022.
They then used this info to create map representations of the ice sheet for each month within the interval. Afterward, they studied the maps to establish patterns in the way in which the ice sheet expanded or gotten smaller.
Although the extra lack of greater than 1,000 gigatonnes of ice isn’t sufficient so as to add to sea degree rise worldwide, it represents a big inflow of contemporary water to the ocean, the consultants conclude. Recent research have instructed that adjustments within the salinity of the North Atlantic Ocean from melting icebergs might weaken the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, a part of the worldwide “conveyor belt” of currents that transport warmth and salt across the ocean. This might affect climate patterns worldwide, in addition to have an effect on ecosystems, the authors stated.
“The Day after Tomorrow”- Holywood blockbuster not thus far fetched?
That ocean circulation is the topic of a extensively reported and regarding research not too long ago revealed in Science Advances. The rising inflow of contemporary water from Greenland ice sheet soften is a key think about adjustments to AMOC, one of many key local weather and ocean forces of the planet. Studies have proven the AMOC to be slowing, however there’s a lot debate over whether or not or when a whole collapse or shutdown would possibly happen.
The research identifies early warning indicators and finds that the “nightmare” situation of an abrupt shutdown of Atlantic Ocean currents that “might put giant components of Europe in a deep freeze”, as AP’s Seth Borenstein places it, is wanting a bit extra doubtless and nearer than earlier than, with a “cliff-like” tipping level looming sooner or later. The researchers discovered that the catastrophic growth might occur inside many years, relatively than the centuries beforehand assumed. That is a really horrifying prospect.
The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), stated it has medium confidence that there won’t be a collapse earlier than 2100 and customarily downplays catastrophe eventualities. But research lead writer Rene van Westen, a local weather scientist and oceanographer at Utrecht University within the Netherlands, a number of scientists not concerned within the analysis and a research final yr say that will not be proper.
“We are shifting nearer (to the collapse), however we we’re undecided how a lot nearer,” Van Westen stated. “We are heading in the direction of a tipping level.”
When this international climate calamity could occur is “the million-dollar query, which we sadly can’t reply in the meanwhile,” van Westen stated. He stated it’s doubtless a century away however nonetheless might occur in his lifetime. (He is thirty).
“It additionally relies on the speed of local weather change we’re inducing as humanity,” van Westen stated.
There we now have it.
The Daily Telegraph quoted Professor Jonathan Bamber, director of the Bristol Glaciology Centre, saying the brand new analysis was “completely unrealistic for even probably the most excessive warming situation over the subsequent century”. But on the scientific weblog ActualClimate, ocean scientist Professor Stefan Rahmstorf, head of Earth Systems Analysis on the Potsdam Institute for Climate Research in Germany, describes the research as “a serious advance in AMOC stability science.” He describes it as “observational information from the South Atlantic which counsel the AMOC is on tipping course”. The mannequin simulation was “simply there to get a greater understanding of which early warning indicators work and why”, Rahmstorf says.
“The new research provides considerably to the rising concern about an AMOC collapse within the no-too-distant future,” Rahmstorf stated in an electronic mail to AP. “We will ignore this at our peril.”
University of Exeter local weather scientist Tim Lenton, additionally not a part of the analysis, stated the brand new research makes him extra involved a few collapse. An AMOC collapse would trigger so many ripples all through the world’s local weather which are “so abrupt and extreme that they might be close to unattainable to adapt to in some areas,” Lenton stated.
Polar bears again within the headlines
When it involves speaking the Climate Emergency, there was a variety of debate in recent times concerning the effectiveness of polar bear photos. Some media and conservation teams have moved away from specializing in the undoubtedly photogenic polar bears on the grounds that such photographs have been over-used previously and likewise weren’t appropriate to convey the massive risk to humankind in addition to the planet as a complete.
I’ve by no means seen it fairly like that. Polar bears on dwindling ice work for me. We are all on this collectively. It’s not simply concerning the bears. Climate change is threatening the biodiversity of the planet, of which we’re an element. That doesn’t imply I’m any much less involved concerning the tens of millions in low-lying areas, areas removed from the poles, already bearing the brunt of climate extremes, droughts and floods, sea degree rise and meals shortages. The causes are the identical. And whether or not you prefer it or not, there will be no denying that many individuals are moved by photographs of “cute and cuddly” animals the place they swap off from photos of disaster-stricken human distress.
Anyway, the white giants have made it again into the headlines with a brand new research revealed within the journal Nature Communications exhibiting that polar bears in Canada’s Hudson Bay danger hunger as local weather change lengthens intervals with out Arctic Sea ice, though they’re making an attempt to broaden their diets. They depend on the ocean ice throughout colder months to hunt seals, their essential supply of meals.
With the Arctic warming as much as 4 instances quicker than the remainder of the world, the ice-free interval in components of the Arctic is changing into longer, forcing the polar bears to spend increasingly time on land.
“Polar bears are artistic, they’re ingenious, you recognize, they are going to search the panorama for methods to attempt to survive and discover meals sources to compensate their vitality calls for in the event that they’re motivated,” Anthony Pango, a analysis wildlife biologist with the US Geological Survey and lead writer of the research, advised AFP.
The new analysis seems to be at 20 polar bears in Hudson Bay, looking for meals with out sea ice. The scientists used video digital camera GPS collars to trace the polar bears for three-week intervals over the course of three years within the western Hudson Bay, the place the ice-free interval has elevated by three weeks from 1979-2015, that means that within the final decade bears have been on land for about 130 days.
Ultimately the researchers discovered that the bears’ efforts to seek out sustenance on land didn’t present them with sufficient energy to match their regular marine mammal prey. Nineteen out of the 20 polar bears studied misplaced weight in the course of the interval in keeping with the quantity of weight they might lose throughout a interval of fasting, researchers stated. That signifies that the longer polar bears spend on land, the upper their danger for hunger.
The world’s 25,000 polar bears remaining within the wild are endangered primarily by local weather change.
Limiting planet-warming greenhouse gases and maintaining international warming beneath the Paris deal goal of 1.5 levels Celsius above pre-industrial ranges would doubtless protect polar bear populations, Pango stated.
John Whiteman, the chief analysis scientist at Polar Bears International, who was not concerned within the research, commented:
“As ice goes, the polar bears go, and there’s no different resolution apart from stopping ice loss. That is the one resolution,” he advised AFP.
Any grounds for hope?
So issues aren’t wanting good for the Arctic, those that reside there, and the remainder of the planet, given the worldwide affect of these adjustments within the High North.
The Arctic is experiencing disproportionately larger temperature will increase in comparison with the remainder of the planet, triggering a collection of cascading results. This speedy warming has profound implications for international local weather patterns, human populations and wildlife.
All the consultants talked about above are clear about what we now have to do to alter the state of affairs. Rapid and substantial cuts in greenhouse fuel emissions. But what does it take to deliver concerning the adjustments in our consumption patterns and existence to make a distinction?
We have greater than sufficient scientific proof. Maybe we have to flip to the psychologists to learn how to inspire the behavioural adjustments. One factor that has given me somewhat hope is a research by behavioural researchers on the University of Bonn, the Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE in Frankfurt, and the University of Copenhagen. They show for the primary time {that a} broad majority of the world’s inhabitants SUPPORTS local weather motion and is keen to incur a private price to combat local weather change.
Now that’s one thing we don’t normally hear!
The findings, revealed in Nature Climate Change, are based mostly on a globally consultant survey performed in 125 nations, involving roughly 130,000 people. According to the research, 69 p.c of the world’s inhabitants is keen to contribute 1 p.c of their private revenue to the combat towards local weather change, with most overwhelmingly backing inexperienced insurance policies (86 p.c) and demanding bolder management (89 p.c).That can be a big contribution to local weather motion.
It hardly appears shocking that the willingness to combat local weather change is considerably larger in nations notably affected by international warming. In wealthier nations with a excessive GDP per capita, the willingness is decrease in comparison with different nations. The Daily Mail picks up on the truth that within the UK, simply 47.6 per cent of Britons stated they’d be keen to contribute. That makes it one in every of simply 11 nations the place nearly all of individuals are not keen to pay 1 p.c of their revenue. That record consists of the USA and Canada. Perhaps individuals are simply too properly off to be keen to make any form of sacrifice? Or are lulled right into a false sense of safety by their present prosperity?
On the entire, although, Armin Falk, behavioural economist and professor of economics on the University of Bonn, a kind of who performed the research, sees the outcomes as “tremendously encouraging”.
“The world’s local weather is a worldwide public good, and its safety requires the cooperative effort of the world’s inhabitants. We set up {that a} broad majority of the world’s inhabitants helps local weather motion,” Falk stated.
“We additionally doc widespread approval of pro-climate social norms in nearly all nations,” says SAFE economist Peter Andre. According to the survey outcomes, 86 p.c of respondents consider that folks of their nation ought to attempt to combat international warming. “Moreover, there’s an nearly common international demand that nationwide governments ought to do extra to combat local weather change,” provides Andre.
More individuals than you assume need local weather motion
Yet in each single nation, the researchers discovered that folks underestimate the willingness of different individuals to combat local weather change.The precise proportion of fellow residents keen to contribute 1 p.c of their revenue to local weather motion (69 p.c) is underestimated by 26 share factors globally.
“Systematic misperceptions about different individuals’s willingness to take motion towards local weather change will be an impediment to the profitable combat towards local weather change. People who systematically underestimate public assist for local weather motion are sometimes much less keen to take motion themselves,” says Falk.
In different phrases, we usually tend to make sacrifices or change our behaviour within the pursuits of the local weather once we assume our neighbours and others will do the identical. That suggests a probably efficient technique to make progress on the local weather entrance.
“Rather than echoing the considerations of a vocal minority who oppose any type of local weather motion, we have to successfully talk that the overwhelming majority of individuals around the globe are keen to behave on local weather change and anticipate their nationwide authorities to behave,” the researchers write.
“The present pessimism is discouraging and paralyzing. Our findings counsel that extra optimism about local weather motion can unleash a optimistic dynamic,” provides Andre.
That is one thing I’m taking to coronary heart right here. A big majority of our fellow residents are literally involved and keen to make sacrifices. How about that to assist fight the Arctic local weather blues? This sense of shared perceptions and customary objective might be key in bringing concerning the political motion and financial transition we have to cut back emissions and make sure the wholesome survival of our planet and life upon it – together with us people who’re making such a large number of it.
