EGN NEWS DESK
You might have observed that “The Garfield Movie” was the No. 1 film in America final week, incomes $14 million and taking excessive spot from the infinitely extra hyped “Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga.” It has grossed $55 million in North America and $156 million globally in two weeks.
After greater than 45 years of each day strips (that also get made day-after-day), three characteristic movies, 76 books, three animated collection, dozens of video video games and a literal boatload of merchandise, we might ask, how did we get right here?
In an try and reply that query, we took a visit down the Garfield rabbit gap.
So Much Merchandise
The very first thing you come throughout is the merchandise. There are T-shirts, telephones, watches, furnishings, clocks, slippers, tents, wallets, buying and selling playing cards, eye shadow and curler skates with Garfield’s leering picture.
There was even a Garfield bathroom seat cowl. “It turned out to be an incredible product. It was actual colourful,” Garfield’s creator, Jim Davis, informed The New York Times in 2019. (There are, in actual fact, quite a few Garfield bathroom seat covers.)
This is not any accident. Davis launched the three-panel newspaper cartoon in 1978 with a watch towards promoting his creation.
“I’d prefer to say it was some kind of a divine inspiration that created the strip,” Davis informed The Washington Post in 1982. “In reality, it wasn’t a lot that as a acutely aware effort to provide you with a superb, marketable character.”
First got here the books. Davis grouped the strips into collections they usually had been a success. In November 1982, The New York Times Trade Paperback Best Sellers checklist featured seven Garfield books amongst its prime 15 titles.
Davis’s creation was so inescapable that for 30 years a seashore in western France reported that items of Garfield telephones had been mysteriously washing up on shore. In 2019, The New York Times reported on the phenomenon, which turned out to be brought on by “a long-lost delivery container, nestled in a rocky sea cave.”
Cohen vs. Coen
From there you get to the cartoons and flicks. The animated “Garfield and Friends” ran for seven seasons from 1988 to 1994. There was “Garfield: The Movie” in 2004, of which A.O. Scott wrote in The Times, “you might be more likely to depart this one feeling as grouchy and put-upon because the title character.” Audiences didn’t appear to thoughts. The movie grossed $203 million globally.
The greatest shock of “Garfield: The Movie” was Bill Murray agreeing to voice Garfield. According to Murray, nonetheless, it was a misunderstanding that led him to do the film within the first place. In a 2010 interview with GQ, Murray joked about taking the position.
“I seemed on the script, and it stated, “So-and-so and Joel Coen.” And I assumed: Christ, effectively, I like these Coens! They’re humorous. So I sorta learn just a few pages of it and thought, Yeah, I’d like to do this.”
It was Joel Cohen, whose credit embrace “Cheaper by the Dozen,” not Joel Coen, the Oscar winner, who was one of many script’s writers. Still, that didn’t cease Murray from returning for the sequel, “Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties.”
‘Garfield Minus Garfield’
In digging a bit of deeper, issues start to get weirder.
In 2008, Dan Walsh, a 33-year-old know-how manager in Dublin, created “Garfield Minus Garfield,” the place he erased Garfield and all the opposite characters from the strips, leaving solely his proprietor, Jon Arbuckle.
That yr, The Times reported on the phenomenon:
Mr. Walsh does nothing to the panels besides strip away Garfield and different characters like Odie the canine and Nermal the kitten to create a brand new, even lonelier environment for Jon Arbuckle, the principle human. Without the cutesy thought-bubbles of his lasagna-loving cat, Jon’s observations appear to teeter between existential disaster and deep despair.
Davis took the chance to license a “Garfield Minus Garfield” e-book.
That appeared to open the floodgates for Garfield content material that embraced odd humor native to the web. Other remixes adopted. There was “Pipe Garfield,” the place the final panel is changed with a panel of Garfield smoking a pipe.
“Garfield Thrown Out the Window” replaces the third panel with Garfield getting thrown out of a window.
“Garfield Censored” is a strip that replaces one panel with one which reads: “The cartoonist has elected to not present this panel because of its graphic nature.”
Live Action Garfield
This is the purpose in your journey the place you may come throughout one thing known as “Lasagna Cat.”
Fatal Farm (the duo of Zachary Johnson and Jeffrey Max) are recognized for creating and directing surreal commercials for Old Spice and Skittles and for his or her work on episodes of “I Think You Should Leave” and “Key and Peele.”
They additionally made “Lasagna Cat,” an online collection with two seasons made 9 years aside. In 2008 they launched 27 brief movies on YouTube that had been stay recreations of Garfield strips adopted by a music video and sometimes ending with picture of Davis.
Almost 10 years later, Fatal Farm launched one other 13 episodes, that includes longer movies with larger manufacturing values and much more weird content material. For instance, in “10/20/1984,” a stay re-enactment of a strip is adopted by a re-creation of the “Miami Vice” episode that includes the Phil Collins traditional “In the Air Tonight.”
Or, there’s “07/27/1978,” the place a stay re-enactment of the strip that includes Garfield smoking a pipe is adopted by an hourlong lecture, voiced by the actor John Blyth Barrymore, dissecting each side of the strip whereas speaking about artwork, the cosmos and corruption within the tobacco trade. It has been seen 3.9 million instances on YouTube.
The closing video within the 2017 season is nearly 5 hours lengthy and is titled “Sex Survey Results.” It is the one video with no date as a title and the one one that doesn’t characteristic a re-creation of a strip. It can also be one of many strangest movies on the web. It virtually defies description. Watch at your individual danger.
‘I’m Sorry Jon’
Now the journey goes from unusual to darkish.
There is loads of healthful Garfield fan artwork on the market (like Garfemon, which imagines Garfield as Pokemon), however there may be additionally a really weird and really darkish Garfield fan artwork subculture.
In 2013, the artists Sam and Toby Alden posted an online comedian during which Jon Arbuckle awakes to search out himself inside Garfield, and Garfield tells him, “I’m Sorry Jon. I used to be so hungry.”
This was adopted by Garfold, Gramfel and a collection of Instagram posts by Catherine Burke, all of whom took the character of Garfield and turned him right into a hideous monster terrifying his proprietor.
This style of artwork turned so standard that it spawned a piece of Reddit often known as r/imsorryjon, with over 800,000 customers, that’s devoted to darkish Garfield fan artwork. This phenomenon is also called “Gorefield” or “Creepy Garfield” and it’s very, very bizarre.
‘Don’t Look within the Basement’
After taking a deep breath, we went again to Garfield strips (once more, new ones seem day-after-day) and books to see the place this darkish aspect of Garfield could be coming from.
If you look exhausting sufficient, there are glimpses of it in some unique Garfield content material. “Garfield: His Nine Lives” was a surprisingly unsettling 1984 e-book that options 9 Garfield tales, most drawn by artists aside from Davis. One of the tales ends with a primal model of Garfield attacking a grandmother.
In early Garfield comics, Jon had a roommate, Lyman, who abruptly stopped showing within the strips. When requested the place Lyman had gone, Davis jokingly wrote, “Don’t look within the basement.”
A 2002 on-line online game known as Garfield’s Scary Scavenger Hunt featured Lyman chained to the basement wall of a haunted home.
There was a collection of Halloween strips in 1989 (often known as “Garfield Alone”) that learn like one thing out of “The Twilight Zone” and spawned unusual theories that the complete strip has all the time taken place in Garfield’s creativeness.
The panel ends with Garfield going by what looks as if an existential disaster and starting to query actuality. After taking a deep (perhaps too deep?) dive into Garfield lore and fandom, we all know the sensation.
