Friedrich St. Florian, an architect whose design for the World War II Memorial on the National Mall in Washington impressed criticism and controversy in addition to reward, died on Dec. 18 at his house in Providence, R.I. He was 91.
His dying was confirmed by his daughter Alisia.
From the start, the memorial itself, its siting on the Mall in proximity to the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial, and Mr. St. Florian’s design, all provoked opposition.
The memorial, a bronze and granite monument that includes going through semicircles of 56 pillars adorned with bronze wreaths, and punctuated by two triumphal arches, was criticized as banal, beneath its topic and evoking the fascist dictatorships whose defeat it ostensibly commemorated.
Others praised Mr. St. Florian for a design that match seamlessly into its hallowed area on the Mall.
The pillars signify the states and territories, and the arches, the 2 principal theaters of the struggle. The semicircles of pillars face a pool with a fountain, and 24 bronze bas-reliefs on the doorway balustrades illustrate scenes from the struggle years, at house and overseas.
Despite all of the criticism the memorial remains to be on the Mall, greater than 20 years after its opening, and 1000’s go to yearly. Mr. St. Florian, an immigrant from Austria who was dean of architectural research on the Rhode Island School of Design from 1978 to 1988, was principally unfazed by the criticism, although he acknowledged that he was stung by comparisons to the Nazi architect Albert Speer.
“In 20 years, it is going to be a part of this household of nice memorials, and no one could have any arguments about it,” he advised a New York Times reporter in 2000, because the controversy simmered. Another Times journalist who went to see him in Providence 4 years later, shortly earlier than the monument’s inauguration, reported that the architect “exudes a sure calm and detachment.”
In a speech at Kenyon College in 2014, Mr. St. Florian defined that “monuments are anticipated to maintain remembrance alive,” including: “They provide the consolation of a reminiscence switch, that permits us to neglect.”
Dietrich Neumann, a professor of structure and artwork historical past at Brown University, who curated a retrospective of Mr. St. Florian’s work in 2006, praised him for striving to satisfy the wants of each context and constituents. “He revered the memorial panorama, and the prevailing style amongst these veterans who wished to really feel at house,” Mr. Neumann stated in an interview, that means that the fashion would have been acquainted to them from Washington’s different monuments.
The criticism, although, was fierce.
Herbert Muschamp, the structure critic of The New York Times, known as Mr. St. Florian’s design “critically flawed,” in a 2001 overview.
He stated it “diminishes the substance of its architectural context,” in contrast the memorial’s “fashionable classical fashion” to constructions erected below “Mussolini, Roosevelt, Stalin and different authorities leaders within the Thirties,” and stated it “shows a profound sense of historic amnesia,” largely as a result of it substituted a bland imaginative and prescient of triumph, within the critic’s view, for perception into the particular, cataclysmic nature of the battle.
“It is trustworthy to Ronald Reagan, who confused making fight coaching motion pictures with truly seeing wartime motion,” Mr. Muschamp concluded.
A Washington Post critic, Marc Fisher, was no much less scathing.
“The National World War II Memorial has the emotional impression of a slab of granite,” he wrote. “If it tells any story in any respect, it’s so broad as to be indecipherable.”
“Nowhere does it honor the good struggle’s transformational position in our historical past,” Mr. Fisher added, citing the struggle’s unifying impact on a various nation. “I had feared that this memorial can be the hodgepodge of cliché and Soviet-style pomposity that it’s.”
Mr. Neumann countered that there was “a sure humility” in Mr. St. Florian’s method. “It wasn’t about making a press release about himself, it was about creating the suitable constructing for the circumstances.”
And Mr. St. Florian’s plan drew assist from Senator Robert Dole, a World War II veteran; Frederick Smith, chairman of Federal Express; and Tom Hanks, the actor who starred within the World War II film “Saving Private Ryan.”
Friedrich Florian Gartler was born in Graz, Austria, on Dec. 21, 1932, the son of Friedrich Gartler, a hydraulic engineer, and Maria (Prassl) Gartler. He acquired a level in structure from the Graz University of Technology in 1960. After graduating, he petitioned the Austrian authorities to change his identify to St. Florian to recall that of a Roman military commander who was martyred for refusing to observe orders concentrating on Christians.
He received a Fulbright Fellowship in 1961 and got here to Columbia University, the place he earned a grasp’s diploma in city design. He joined the college of the Rhode Island School of Design in 1963 and taught there for over 50 years, in addition to on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for a interval within the Nineteen Seventies.
Mr. St. Florian additionally had a personal structure apply in Providence, and was the principal architect for a significant downtown shopping center, Providence Place, which opened in 1999 and is now in receivership. He positioned second within the competitors for the Centre Pompidou in Paris, and received for the memorial design in 1996, an occasion which, as he acknowledged, modified his life and profession.
In addition to his daughter Alisia, Mr. St. Florian is survived by his spouse, Livia, one other daughter, Ilaria, and 5 grandchildren.
Mr. Neumann, the Brown professor, famous that criticism of the monuments to Jefferson and Washington on the Mall had additionally been fierce. But “for the long term, for this continuity you need to have, I believe he was proper.”
“He noticed the multifaceted wants of this memorial, particularly for the veterans,” Mr. Neumann continued. “I believe he weighed that very fastidiously.”