EGN NEWS DESK
Four former Twitter executives sued Elon Musk on Monday, accusing the billionaire of withholding severance funds price $128 million after he fired them from the corporate throughout his 2022 takeover.
When Mr. Musk purchased Twitter for $44 billion, he fired Parag Agrawal, its chief government; Ned Segal, its chief monetary officer; Vijaya Gadde, its head of authorized and coverage; and Sean Edgett, its basic counsel. Mr. Musk later renamed the corporate X.
The executives had clauses of their contracts stipulating that they might obtain severance if Twitter was not a public firm — so when Mr. Musk took the corporate personal in October 2022, they have been entitled to the funds, the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims. The severance included one 12 months’s wage plus unvested inventory awards.
The lawsuit was filed in opposition to Mr. Musk, X and several other workers of Mr. Musk’s rocket firm, SpaceX, who served as Twitter’s de facto human assets division after the takeover.
Mr. Agrawal’s annual wage was $1 million, and he was awarded $12.5 million in inventory that was scheduled to vest incrementally, in line with his supply letter for the function. In the occasion of an involuntary termination, Mr. Agrawal was entitled to a so-called golden parachute cost of $60 million, in line with a Twitter securities submitting. Under those self same circumstances, Mr. Segal would obtain $46 million and Ms. Gadde $21 million, in line with the submitting.
At the time of the takeover, Mr. Musk stated that he might fireplace the executives “for trigger” to keep away from paying them severance. Mr. Musk instructed his biographer, Walter Isaacson, that he would deny the executives’ severance funds, saving himself about $200 million. He instructed Mr. Isaacson he would “hunt” the executives “until the day they die.”
Lawyers for the executives wrote in court docket paperwork: “This is the Musk playbook: to maintain the cash he owes different individuals, and power them to sue him. Even in defeat, Musk can impose delay, trouble and expense on others much less in a position to afford it.”
The executives beforehand sued Mr. Musk for authorized charges they incurred whereas responding to investigations into the corporate. In October, a Delaware judge ordered Mr. Musk to pay them $1.1 million to cowl these bills.
A consultant for X declined to remark. A lawyer for Mr. Musk didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
