EGN NEWS DESK
Dawkins’ admiration for “cultural” Christianity isn’t new. What has modified is the dawning realisation of how a lot we now have misplaced.
The Christian web was set ablaze with feedback from uber-atheist Professor Richard Dawkins on Easter Sunday. He mentioned he considers himself a “cultural Christian” and that he values the traditions of the religion.
Many commentators didn’t realise that his phrases by themselves usually are not new – Dawkins has been describing himself like this since 2007, though he nonetheless adamantly disbelieves in God. What he means is that he likes Christmas carols, lovely cathedrals, and he’s keen on the meek and gentle model of Anglicanism that after prospered on this nation.
But the cultural environment has modified considerably since then, when the books of the “new atheists” like Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens have been bestsellers. Today there may be extra public dialogue of Christian contribution to civilisation, and some well-known folks have grow to be believers, corresponding to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a pal of Dawkins.
The decline of the West appears to have prompted nostalgia concerning the previous in addition to real concern that one thing essential has been misplaced. For some, corresponding to Ali, there appears to have been greater than only a want for the cultural results, however a private religion too. I’ve beforehand argued that Christianity solely issues whether it is true – and the highly effective transformations it will probably herald people who do consider is one manifestation of its energy, in addition to proof of its reality.
In the interview with LBC, launched on Easter Sunday, Dawkins mentioned he loved “residing in a culturally Christian nation though I don’t consider a phrase of the Christian religion.” This contains the virgin start and the resurrection, he mentioned. “The issues that Christians consider are literally nonsense.” The interviewer, Rachel Johnson, mentioned her personal wrestling with religion and the miraculous claims of Christianity. The full interview is offered on YouTube.
Dawkins was additionally not altering his tune when he made vital feedback about Islam and its remedy of ladies and homosexual folks. “If I had to decide on between Christianity and Islam, I’d select Christianity each single time,” he mentioned. “It appears to me to be a basically respectable faith, in a method that I feel Islam isn’t.”
What has modified although, is his consciousness of the fact that Islam is now being promoted within the UK in some locations, corresponding to lights for Ramadan on Oxford Street, or messages from Islamic scriptures on prepare station noticeboards – each occurred in the course of the Christian interval of Lent, for which there was no comparable promotion. Dawkins mentioned he was “barely horrified” about this and that he supported Christianity as a “bulwark” in opposition to Islam. He appears nostalgic for the tradition of Christendom, and he has beforehand spoken in opposition to the rise of extremes of recent “woke” ideology, too.
Multiple Christians identified that Dawkins himself has contributed to the change he’s lamenting. Memes flourished about sawing off the branch you are sitting on, sticking a department within the wheels of the bike you are riding, or the cartoon “I would like issues to be completely different” who then utters “oh no” when observing the wreckage caused. Some didn’t pull their punches: “Evidence but once more that the nice professors may be absolute morons,” mentioned conservative commentator Laura Perrins on X. “He has accomplished a lot injury to Christianity, cultural and in any other case. Did he actually suppose nothing would fill the void?”
However it could possibly be mentioned that Dawkins hasn’t actually contributed that a lot to the decline. The poor arguments of his ilk have in some folks prompted a transfer in the direction of religion, and triggered different optimistic results corresponding to sharpening the Church’s mental capabilities. The deterioration of Christian perception within the UK has been gradual and a very long time coming: writers CS Lewis and GK Chesterton, for instance, predicted the trajectory many a long time in the past. Dawkins’ private contribution has been minimal.
What can also be new is a extra widespread questioning of the dogma of progressivism – the relentless pursuit of enchancment whereas sidelining or fully rejecting custom, which in apply has typically included Christian perception. This momentum is perceived as a great factor by most individuals right now, unaware that it’s a pretty new thought: earlier generations have been extra respectful of their historical past. Attempts to re-engineer an imaginary “higher world” typically result in unexpected penalties, as Dawkins appears to be studying as he mourns the lack of Christian tradition whereas rejecting the tenets that had created and sustained it.
Esme Partridge in Unherd slammed Dawkins feedback as “naivety”. She argued his perspective is just like one other large social change: his technology’s stance on the sexual revolution. They personally benefitted from the outdated morals, but on the identical time put the long run availability of such optimistic results in query by attacking their foundations.
“Dawkins’s perception that it’s attainable to reap the cultural advantages of Christianity whereas publicly undermining its legitimacy is probably an expression of this generational mentality,” she wrote. This was additionally the perspective of Enlightenment thinkers corresponding to Locke and Montesquieu, who believed that liberal values can be upheld with out Christianity. Partridge factors out that this has been proven to be false too, as they’ve mutated into “anarchic techniques of self-interest which undermine the virtues upon which liberalism was initially premised.”
She provides her voice to the requires a renewal. “Like any organism, Christianity should get better its roots, or it’s going to die — a reality of life which, as an evolutionary biologist, Dawkins ought to understand,” she mentioned.
Of course, trustworthy Christians reside on, and have been debating and praying about these points for years, effectively earlier than Dawkins got here on the scene. As society’s lamentations develop, and the unfavourable results grow to be starker, can anybody present the way in which again?
Heather Tomlinson is a Christian journalist. Find her on Substack at http://heathertomlinson.substack.com
