EGN NEWS DESK
Remember again when politicians have been touting the success of bail reform? Remember the meaningless and misleading numbers they threw round?
NYC Comptroller Brad Lander claimed in a report that only one% of individuals launched on bail underneath bail reform are rearrested for a violent felony whereas their case is pending.
State Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins mentioned the quantity was 2%.
Remember how the information media and progressive politicians repeated these numbers and claimed that bail reform was successful and had no influence on crime, whilst crime rose 30-40% after bail reform took impact?
Well, a brand new examine of bail reform exterior New York City — suburbs and upstate — ready by John Jay College of Criminal Justice’s Data Collaborative for Justice reveals that 66% of the individuals launched underneath bail reform who had a current prior arrest have been re-arrested inside two years of their launch.
The DCJ examine additionally confirmed that 67% of defendants who had a current prior violent felony arrest prior to now yr who have been launched underneath bail reform have been re-arrested inside two years of their arraignment.
Almost half — 49% — have been rearrested for a felony.
The truth {that a} examine reveals that individuals who have dedicated crimes are inclined to proceed to commit extra crimes isn’t actually stunning.
My evaluation of bail reform revealed by the Manhattan Institute in August of 2022 confirmed NYC re-arrest charges of near 70% for individuals with prior information charged with larceny, housebreaking, theft, and prison contempt whereas their case was pending.
But DCJ is not any conservative assume tank. On the opposite, they’ve been vocal supporters of, and cheerleaders for, New York’s disastrous bail reform legal guidelines from the start.
This explicit DCJ examine was supported by the Arnold Ventures Philanthropic Trust, a professional bail reform philanthropic group.
That’s why the numbers that DCJ calculated are so attention-grabbing. DCJ gained’t say it outright, however their numbers present that bail reform has been a failure — as if the rising crime charge after bail reform was not sufficient proof.
In truth, the DCJ tries to counsel bail reform is successful as a result of, “Across all of New York State, bail reform tended to scale back recidivism for individuals dealing with much less severe expenses and with restricted or no current prison historical past.”
But is that actually who we must be apprehensive about? Opponents of no-bail are apprehensive about repeat, continual offenders moderately than one-time criminals.
And, the truth is, DCJ examine discovered that bail reform “tended to extend recidivism for individuals dealing with extra severe expenses” (violent crimes) “and with current prison histories.”
In different phrases, dangerous individuals and repeat offenders dedicated crimes at the next charge underneath bail reform than an analogous group who had bail set or have been remanded underneath the previous bail legislation.
A earlier DCJ examine on NYC additionally discovered that the 2020 amendments to the unique bail reform legislation, which barely toughened the bail legal guidelines to permit judges to set bail on sure repeat offenders, really decreased recidivism.
And but even these sky-high re-arrest charges really undercount the harm these launched defendants trigger, since they solely depend the variety of defendants who get re-arrested, not the variety of occasions they get re-arrested. Nor does each crime end in an arrest.
Arrests exterior NYC decreased from 184,000 in 2019 to 154,000 in 2022, whilst crimes elevated. In truth, whereas there have been 17,000 extra crimes in 2022 than in 2019, there have been 30,000 fewer arrests.
More individuals are getting away with crime with out being arrested, reducing re-arrest charges..
Recidivism is the issue. Last yr the NYPD launched a examine that confirmed that simply 327 individuals have been chargeable for 30% of all shoplifting arrests in NYC in 2022.
They have been arrested a mean of 20 occasions every that yr.
There is not any telling what number of occasions they received away with shoplifting and didn’t get arrested.
But are you able to think about the decline in shoplifting that may have occurred had simply these 327 people been held in jail after say, their FIFTH shoplifting arrest that yr?
Allowing judges to contemplate the defendant’s hazard to public security and danger of recidivism when setting bail (because the overwhelming majority of states and the federal authorities do) would go an extended technique to defending the general public.
This isn’t rocket science. Anyone concerned within the prison justice system might inform you with a fairly excessive diploma of accuracy that individuals with lengthy prison information, particularly current prison information, are inclined to proceed their prison exercise.
- 66% of the individuals arrested within the first six months of 2023 in New York State for a felony had a previous conviction or a pending case after they have been arrested.
- 20% had a pending non-violent felony
- 10% had a pending violent felony.
That is why bail reform was so dangerous. In addition to releasing 2,000 profession criminals from NYC jails and hundreds extra from suburban and upstate jails, bail reform prevented judges from setting bail on many of those similar people after they received arrested and they also have been let out to re-offend.
The drawback with this examine is that the authors are desperately looking for methods to declare bail reform successful. They declare victory as a result of “total” recidivism is down from a management group earlier than the legislation handed.
But that’s a poor comparability, as a result of so many extra criminals are being let out that even when the “charge” of recidivism goes up by a small proportion, the general variety of crimes will increase by lots.
And once more, evaluating the recidivism of individuals arrested for his or her first crime misrepresents what the most important opposition to no-bail legal guidelines are: In brief, that judges don’t have the discretion to take prison historical past into consideration.
The examine’s authors at one level concede that statistics “point out that the obligatory launch of individuals with current justice involvement, even when comparatively minor, might be detrimental to recidivism.”
That is the lesson that New York politicians refuse to take to coronary heart.
Jim Quinn was govt district lawyer within the Queens DA’s Office, the place he served for 42 years.
